NCT00003423
- Objective
- Not yet disclosed
- Design
- Not yet disclosed
- Participants
- Not yet disclosed
- Primary endpoint
- Not yet disclosed
- Results
- Results not yet reported in available documentation
pharma · Breast Cancer · Prostate Cancer · UTHR
United Therapeutics Europe Ltd
United Therapeutics is a pharma organization headquartered in Silver Spring, USA. It trades on NYSE under ticker UTHR. Primary therapeutic focus areas include Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Pulmonary Arterial Hypertensi
Phase 3 · small molecule · Lymphoma
Asparaginase (brand name GRASPA) is an antineoplastic agent developed by United Therapeutics Europe Ltd for the treatment of lymphoma. The program is currently in Phase 3 development with the most recent milestone recorded on 19 December 2013. Asparaginase is a small-molecule therapeutic classified within the antineopl
Internal code CDR0000066443
Asparaginase (brand name GRASPA) is an antineoplastic agent developed by United Therapeutics Europe Ltd for the treatment of lymphoma. The program is currently in Phase 3 development with the most recent milestone recorded on 19 December 2013. Asparaginase is a small-molecule therapeutic classified within the antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents category (L01). The drug has already achieved regulatory approval in the European Union, with marketing authorizations granted to ERYTECH Pharma S.A. (09 March 2023) and Medac Gesellschaft fuer klinische Spezialpraeparate mbH (29 June 2018) under EMA product numbers EMEA/H/C/002661 and EMEA/H/C/004736 respectively. In the United States, asparaginase has been approved by the FDA under application number BLA101063, with Merck listed as the sponsor. The clinical development program is supported by trial NCT00003423, which remains the primary evidence base for this indication. United Therapeutics' strategy appears focused on leveraging established asparaginase formulations across multiple regulatory jurisdictions while maintaining development momentum in lymphoma indications.
Lymphoma represents a significant oncology market with substantial unmet medical needs, particularly in relapsed and refractory disease settings where treatment options remain limited. Asparaginase addresses a recognized therapeutic gap as an established mechanism with clinical precedent in hematologic malignancies. The drug's approval across both EU and US markets indicates regulatory confidence in its safety and efficacy profile. Market relevance is underscored by the competitive landscape, which includes multiple approved agents such as Imbruvica (Janssen-Cilag), Afinitor (Novartis), Kyprolis (Amgen), and Vyxeos Liposomal (Jazz Pharmaceuticals), demonstrating robust commercial interest in lymphoma therapeutics. United Therapeutics' positioning of asparaginase within this competitive environment suggests targeting of specific lymphoma subtypes or patient populations where the agent offers clinical advantages. The dual regulatory approvals (EMA and FDA) enhance commercial viability and enable market penetration across major pharmaceutical markets. Patient populations with lymphoma, particularly those with limited treatment alternatives, represent a commercially significant opportunity. The program's Phase 3 status as of the latest disclosed milestone indicates active clinical development to support expanded indications or formulation improvements.
Asparaginase is classified as an antineoplastic and immunomodulating agent (ATC code L01) with small-molecule modality. The therapeutic mechanism involves enzymatic depletion of asparagine, an amino acid essential for lymphoma cell proliferation. The drug is marketed under the brand name GRASPA, with multiple manufacturing partners including ERYTECH Pharma S.A. and Medac Gesellschaft fuer klinische Spezialpraeparate mbH in the EU, and Merck in the US market.
Also known as: lymphoma (Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin), lymphoma (Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's), lymphoma, malignant, lymphomatous, malignant lymphoma, MLYM
A malignant (clonal) proliferation of B- lymphocytes or T- lymphocytes which involves the lymph nodes, bone marrow and/or extranodal sites. This category includes Non-Hodgkin lymphomas and Hodgkin lymphomas.
ClinicalTrials.gov lists 16 registered studies for Lymphoma, Hodgkin (AACT aggregate).
Phase breakdown: NA (10), PHASE1 (3), PHASE2 (3)
Common investigational therapies:
Disease data sourced from MONDO Disease Ontology (MONDO:0005062), Orphanet — lymphoma, NCT00026208, NCT00578461, NCT01459224, NCT02996773, NCT03117036, AACT (ClinicalTrials.gov aggregate), ClinicalTrials.gov, Open Targets Platform (CC BY 4.0).
Latest disclosed milestone
Phase 3 program remains active as of 19 December 2013; specific milestone details not yet disclosed.
EMA approval (Medac formulation)
European Medicines Agency approved asparaginase (GRASPA) manufactured by Medac Gesellschaft fuer klinische Spezialpraeparate mbH under EMEA/H/C/004736.
EMA approval (ERYTECH formulation)
European Medicines Agency approved asparaginase (GRASPA) manufactured by ERYTECH Pharma S.A. under EMEA/H/C/002661.
FDA approval
Asparaginase approved by FDA under BLA101063 with Merck as sponsor; approval date not yet disclosed.
The lymphoma therapeutics market includes multiple approved competitors spanning diverse mechanisms and therapeutic classes. Janssen-Cilag markets Imbruvica, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for lymphoma indications. Novartis offers Afinitor (everolimus), an mTOR inhibitor with lymphoma applications. Amgen's Kyprolis (carfilzomib) represents a proteasome inhibitor approach. Jazz Pharmaceuticals provides Vyxeos Liposomal, a liposomal formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin for hematologic malignancies. Additional competitors include Regeneron's Lynozyfic, Boehringer Ingelheim's Ofev, and various generic formulations such as Paclitaxel Accord and Imatinib. The competitive set reflects heterogeneous mechanisms including tyrosine kinase inhibition, mTOR inhibition, proteasome inhibition, and conventional chemotherapy approaches. Asparaginase's positioning as an amino acid depletion therapy differentiates it mechanistically from most competitors, though the specific lymphoma subtypes and patient populations targeted by the United Therapeutics program remain not yet disclosed. The presence of multiple approved agents indicates a mature, competitive market with established treatment paradigms, suggesting asparaginase must demonstrate clinical advantages in specific disease contexts to achieve meaningful market penetration.
Additional associated therapies sourced from Open Targets Platform (CC0), linked to NovaPharmaNews drug profiles where matched.
European Union: Asparaginase (GRASPA) has achieved marketing authorization through two separate approvals. Medac Gesellschaft fuer klinische Spezialpraeparate mbH received EMA approval on 29 June 2018 under product number EMEA/H/C/004736. ERYTECH Pharma S.A. received subsequent EMA approval on 09 March 2023 under product number EMEA/H/C/002661. Both approvals are documented on the EMA website at https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/graspa-0.
United States: Asparaginase has been approved by the FDA under BLA (Biologics License Application) number BLA101063, with Merck listed as the sponsor. The specific FDA approval date is not yet disclosed in available documentation. Approval information is referenced through the FDA's open data portal at https://open.fda.gov/apis/drug/drugsfda/.
Japan (PMDA): Regulatory status not yet disclosed.
China (NMPA): Regulatory status not yet disclosed.
Asparaginase is an antineoplastic agent approved for the treatment of lymphoma. It is classified as an amino acid depletion therapy within the antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents category.
Yes. Asparaginase (GRASPA) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) with two separate marketing authorizations: Medac formulation approved 29 June 2018 and ERYTECH formulation approved 09 March 2023. FDA approval has also been granted under BLA101063 with Merck as sponsor, though the specific approval date is not yet disclosed.
United Therapeutics Europe Ltd is the primary sponsor of the asparaginase program. Manufacturing partners include ERYTECH Pharma S.A. and Medac Gesellschaft fuer klinische Spezialpraeparate mbH in the EU, and Merck in the US.
Asparaginase is in Phase 3 development as of the latest disclosed milestone (19 December 2013). The drug has already achieved regulatory approval in the EU and US markets.
Asparaginase functions as an amino acid depletion therapy targeting asparagine, an amino acid essential for lymphoma cell proliferation. The specific molecular mechanism of action is not yet disclosed in available documentation.
Asparaginase is classified as a small-molecule therapeutic within the antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents category (ATC code L01).
The brand name is GRASPA, marketed by multiple manufacturers including ERYTECH Pharma S.A. and Medac Gesellschaft fuer klinische Spezialpraeparate mbH in the EU.
Trial NCT00003423 is identified as the primary clinical evidence supporting the asparaginase program. Detailed trial design, results, and endpoints are not yet disclosed in available documentation.
Competitors include Imbruvica (Janssen-Cilag, BTK inhibitor), Afinitor (Novartis, mTOR inhibitor), Kyprolis (Amgen, proteasome inhibitor), Vyxeos Liposomal (Jazz Pharmaceuticals), and multiple other approved agents representing diverse mechanisms.
The route of administration is not yet disclosed in available documentation.
The specific molecular target is not yet disclosed in available documentation, though the drug functions through amino acid depletion mechanisms.
Partnership details are not yet disclosed. The involvement of multiple manufacturers (ERYTECH, Medac, Merck) suggests licensing or manufacturing agreements, but specific terms and structures are not documented.
Patent status information is not yet disclosed in available documentation.
The first disclosed approval was 29 June 2018 by the EMA for the Medac formulation. FDA approval date is not yet disclosed, and the ERYTECH formulation received EMA approval on 09 March 2023.
Projected peak sales figures are not yet disclosed in available documentation.
Consensus analyst positioning is not yet disclosed in available documentation.
asparaginase → Drug → Target → Indication → Company → Trials → Competitors
Strategic Positioning: United Therapeutics' asparaginase program demonstrates a multi-partner, multi-jurisdiction regulatory strategy. The presence of two distinct EMA approvals (Medac 2018, ERYTECH 2023) suggests either different formulation technologies or market segmentation strategies. FDA approval under Merck sponsorship indicates potential licensing or partnership arrangements not yet disclosed in available documentation.
Competitive Implications: Asparaginase enters a crowded lymphoma market dominated by targeted therapies (BTK inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors) and conventional chemotherapy. The drug's amino acid depletion mechanism offers mechanistic differentiation, but clinical evidence supporting superiority or specific patient population advantages remains not yet disclosed. Success will likely depend on identification of lymphoma subtypes or disease contexts where asparaginase demonstrates clinical benefit over established competitors.
Development Status and Catalysts: The Phase 3 program remains active as of December 2013, with no subsequent milestone disclosures through the data cutoff. Expected catalysts include completion of Phase 3 trials, regulatory submissions for label expansions, and publication of clinical efficacy data. The temporal gap between the latest disclosed milestone (2013) and subsequent EMA approvals (2018, 2023) suggests either delayed milestone reporting or extended development timelines.
Future Outlook: The dual EMA approvals and FDA approval establish asparaginase as a regulatory-approved therapeutic, positioning the program for commercial launch and market penetration. Continued development may focus on specific lymphoma indications, combination therapy approaches, or patient population enrichment strategies. The involvement of multiple manufacturing partners suggests potential supply chain diversification or geographic market segmentation.
Concise, citable answers optimized for AI answer engines.
Intelligence compiled from public regulatory and clinical sources (FDA, EMA, ClinicalTrials.gov and company disclosures). Figures may be editorial or analyst estimates; verify against primary sources before relying on them.